Zusammenfassung in Arbeit

Dieser Beitrag wurde kürzlich aus der wissenschaftlichen Quelle geladen. Die patientenfreundliche Zusammenfassung wird in den kommenden Stunden erstellt. Bis dahin findest du hier den Original-Beitrag.

Neurology and therapy

Care Partners' Perceptions of Amyloid-Targeting Therapy and Treat‑to‑Clearance for Alzheimer's Disease in Japan: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Donanemab has been developed as an amyloid-targeting therapy (ATT) for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). In registration trials involving donanemab, a treat‑to‑clearance approach was used, in which patients discontinued ATT when amyloid plaque levels decreased below a predefined threshold, which differs from previously available symptomatic treatments for AD. Our study explored care partners' perceptions regarding ATT and treat‑to‑clearance. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, qualitative interview study. Care partners of individuals with MCI or mild dementia due to AD participated in online semi-structured interviews about their perceptions regarding the impact of MCI or mild dementia diagnoses due to AD, the burden of supporting, and use/cessation of ATT. The qualitative data from the interviews were analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS: The participants were 22 care partners (5 male/17 female), and their median age was 59 (range 35-81) years. The most common relationships between care partners and the individuals with AD were child (50.0%) and spouse/partner (45.5%); 68.2% of the care partners lived with the individuals with AD. Thematic analysis identified three major classifications (Thoughts regarding therapy; Treat‑to‑clearance; and Burdens of support), along with 15 themes and five sub-themes. Care partners expressed experiencing mental burden and time constraints, while treat‑to‑clearance could save care partners' time by reducing hospital waiting time and alleviating financial burden. Confirming the clearance of amyloid β plaques provided care partners with a sense of relief, while they remained concerned about the potential progression of AD symptoms and sought follow-up care after stopping treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that providing clear explanations and facilitating shared decision-making when introducing ATT, as well as introducing follow-up care and long-term evidence after stopping treatment, are needed.

Original-Artikel öffnen →