Zusammenfassung in Arbeit

Dieser Beitrag wurde kürzlich aus der wissenschaftlichen Quelle geladen. Die patientenfreundliche Zusammenfassung wird in den kommenden Stunden erstellt. Bis dahin findest du hier den Original-Beitrag.

American journal of clinical and experimental immunology

Aerobic exercise versus acupuncture as adjuncts to acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) remain the standard therapy for Alzheimer's disease (AD), yet their cognitive and functional benefits are limited, creating a strong need for effective adjunctive treatments. Aerobic exercise and acupuncture have been proposed as promising complements to AChEIs because of their potentially synergistic neurotrophic and cholinergic effects. To compare these treatment combinations, we carried out a Bayesian network meta-analysis (BNMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). These studies were sourced from major English and Chinese databases and examined cognitive and functional outcomes. In total, 37 RCTs were included, covering 2,188 participants. Among all, combined acupuncture (SUCRA = 78.92%) and fire needle therapy (SUCRA = 78%) demonstrated the highest probability of improving Mini Mental State Examination scores, while moderate intensity aerobic exercise ranked best for the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog, SUCRA = 23.3%) and the Barthel Index (SUCRA = 71.1%). Combined acupuncture was ranked highest for the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Activities of Daily Living (ADAS-ADL, SUCRA = 94.3%), although its effects did not reach statistical significance. Across analyses, heterogeneity was minimal (I2 ≤ 4%), model convergence was stable, and no publication bias was detected. Overall, this BNMA suggests that combined or thermal acupuncture offers the strongest cognitive gains alongside AChEIs, whereas moderate-intensity aerobic exercise provides the most reliable functional support. Because overall functional improvements were modest and evidence for some interventions remains limited, the benefits appear selective rather than broad. Larger, standardized trials are needed to clarify these patterns and guide their use in practice.

Original-Artikel öffnen →